Click here to find out more
 

Click Here to Shop  -- Meridian Marketplace

LDSGetaway.com
LDSPro.com




Click here to find out more






Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.
Meridian Magazine : : Home

 

Proclaim Peace
by Dean Hughes

Editors' Note: Novelist Dean Hughes has written a series of books called Children of the Promise that explore how World War II blasts a Latter-day Saint family from Salt Lake apart into a world where they face death and war, and tests of their own faith. His new novel, Writing on the Wall is the first of a series looking at the impact of the 60's on the children of that same family. Meridian's editors asked him, as one who has contemplated deeply, the effect of war on the human spirit, to comment on our current situation.

I've spent most of the last decade studying World War II. In doing that, I've tried to challenge the myths and discover what that time was actually like. One of the standard claims about the forties is that everyone was united, that a wonderful feeling of patriotism and togetherness prevailed. Studs Terkel, in his book The Good War, challenged that memory as more legend that reality, and I do suspect that people tend to idealize the past. Still, I found myself adjusting my opinion in the days that followed the terrorist attack on New York and Washington. At no time in my life have I felt such a brotherhood and sisterhood with the people of my country, and never have I been brought to tears so often. What I also recognize is that following the attack on Pearl Harbor-the last occasion of such a horror perpetrated on our country-a great sacrifice was asked of the people, and the sacrifice was made. Nothing, I suspect, could extend such feelings as much as a continued challenge, continued need, continued loss of life. Maybe the people who lived through World War II are remembering something much more real and constant than I had supposed. And maybe, in the coming months and years, we too will be asked to give as much. We hope not, of course, but I think we have all felt in recent days that tragedy has its value. We have been jarred from our security, but also from our complacence and pride, and I think we feel better for it.

In Children of the Promise, I tried to take a hard look at a hard time. I tried to help readers understand the conflicts. Could a religious family face separation and loss and still stay unified? Could a man be a warrior and a Christian simultaneously? Could a POW hold onto love while the object of so much hate? Could the emotional scars of war be overcome by family support, by love of a spouse and children, by trust in God? While I offered affirmative answers, I tried not minimize the difficulty, and certainly I admitted that many, in facing such challenges, did lose faith. The Thomas Family, in my novels, comes through better than most, but not without times when it seemed unlikely, and not without painful changes and adjustments. Still, the novels are as much about coming home as they are about leaving, and in the end, faith is the soft tissue that proves itself tough as bone.

Now I'm writing about a different kind of era in a new series called Hearts of the Children. No one remembers unity during the sixties. In this case, I know more about the atmosphere. I was there. I was a grad student at the University of Washington when classes were shut down in response to the Kent State shootings. I watched armed police, visors in place, clubs in hands, march across the campus. I actually heard the sound a nightstick makes when it strikes a skull. I arrived on campus some mornings to find buildings bombed or set on fire, and I saw students-idealistic, concerned people, many of whom I knew and liked-hurl rocks and bottles at those police. I even witnessed angry demonstrations by the Black Student Union against BYU-and by extension, against my church.

The sixties were as angry and divisive as advertised. Everyone was trying to make sense of questions that were too big to be answered easily, and people on all sides-good people-gave way to anger. Order finally returned, sometimes only with force, but the sense was that the rebellion had failed in the end. Perhaps so, but the world was never the same. The nation didn't accept the solutions that the young revolutionaries fought for, but transitions were begun, and most of us, hardly realizing it, now accept many of those changes.

Whites may have resented the anger of a Malcolm X, but how many would now espouse the racism that existed before the civil rights movement? The women's movement may have changed families in ways that are not always positive, but how many women, or men, would like to go back to male/female relationships of earlier eras? Above all, the sixties raised questions about war: How far should the United States go in playing watch dog for the world? When is war justified?

When our involvement in Vietnam began to accelerate in the mid-sixties, almost all Americans agreed that "stopping Communism" was a worthy goal, worth risking lives for. By the early seventies, many Americans were angry with the leaders of the anti-war movement, but the war had worn thin, and few people believed that it would result in a triumph over Communism. What is not clear to me is whether we, as a people, changed our opinion about war. I have a feeling we are about to find out.

It's interesting to ask what God thinks of war. The question itself makes us nervous about some of the feelings we may have been harboring since September 11. In the Doctrine and Covenants, Section 98, verse 16, the Lord tells his people to "renounce war and proclaim peace." Certainly, few human actions revolt him more than watching one of his children kill another. The "shedding of innocent blood" is clearly one of the most grievous of sins. Time and again, Christ expressed his love for peacemakers, and the gospel itself is referred to as the "gospel of peace."

Christianity, however, does not demand pacifism. Scriptures in the Book of Mormon- even after Christ's visit to the Nephites-grant conditions under which war is justifiable. The stripling warriors may represent one worthy way of dealing with war, but Captain Moroni represents another. War in defense of the innocent, in defense of families, in defense of the gospel, can be honorable. What the Lord despises is bloodthirstiness, viciousness, corruption, secret combinations, killing for its own sake. What he offers is an option so difficult it tests us as much as the challenge to love our enemies. He asks those who fight for just causes to fight with no satisfaction in the killing, and even more, without the loss of spirit.

The problem, of course-and the problem I explore through Alex, in the Children of the Promise-is that it's almost impossible to wallow in mud without getting filthy. Certain Book of Mormon warriors seem to rise to the level God expects; they fight without losing their spiritual commitment to truth and honor. But no drill sergeant dares to send his troops into battle without filling them with the attitude he feels necessary for killing: hatred toward a dehumanized enemy. So that's the dilemma. A warrior without hate in his heart struggles to do his job. A hard-fighting warrior, with love in his heart-even for those he kills-must surely be rare, and yet, that is what God expects. It's hard to imagine a more difficult line to walk.

Just five hours after the first attack on the World Trade Center, BYU students, faculty and staff were called together for a prayer meeting. The Marriot Center was almost filled. We all sang "Come, Come Ye Saints," heard an opening prayer, and then President Merrill J. Bateman spoke to the students. He mourned the death and destruction, but he asked the students to be calm, to continue their work, to trust in God. And then he prayed. He asked for a blessing upon the victims and their families, and then he said what many of us were probably not ready to hear: "Bless the perpetrators." I don't remember the exact words that followed, but I know that he asked that the terrorists' hearts could be changed. I was profoundly touched that he could express love for an enemy, and do it so soon after the atrocity. I knew that what he was asking was exactly right. God loves terrorists, however much he may hate terrorism. And it's only for him to judge their punishment.

We wonder how anyone can go to war and hold onto a spirit of love. But then, how different is it to go to work everyday, or school, and love everyone, even the people who annoy us? What is more difficult than pursuing a living, competing for scarce dollars, hoping to "rise in the company," without seeing our co-workers as the enemy? How can we live in our materialistic society, grab for goods, and remain spiritually grounded? The point I wanted to make, through my stories of World War II, is not just that it's hard to be a loving family in a time of war, but that it's hard all the time-and yet, possible. By the strength of good will, faith, commitment, humor and love, the Thomases do well, if not perfectly well, and they do it in spite of their human weaknesses. Even good President Thomas, stake president and patriarch of the family, has feet of clay. But look down; so do we all. Now look up. Much is asked of us, no matter how weak we are.

Right now, with a new enemy, we certainly have a new test. What I hope is that we will react not only with emotion but with thought and spirit. I have some great concerns. I worry that we will react out of anger and lust for revenge, and we will disappoint our Lord. When I heard President Bateman pray for our enemy, I knew I had to rise to a higher level of spirituality. I had to think the way a disciple of Christ should think. In our zeal to fight terrorism, I hope we don't rush headlong into an action that accomplishes nothing and sheds a great deal of innocent blood. I believe our leaders will be wise about that, but I also believed that in 1965. We must always be careful about giving leaders carte blanche. We must ask the right questions, learn the issues, and pray for guidance-not only for our leaders but for ourselves.

What I hope, more than anything, is that we can learn from this experience-gain a perspective we won't let go of. After the tragedy, certain violent movies were delayed because producers considered the release "insensitive." Won't those same movies be just as brutal, just as bad for our spirits, in coming months? Athletes were saying that sports were "just a game." Won't that still be true in the future, or will we once again give sports a disproportionate emphasis in our lives? In our grief, we are all giving. We are donating our blood and our money. But isn't there always a need for blood, always a need for aid to those who suffer? Will we continue to reach out, or will we slip back into the materialism that lies close to our greedy hearts? We felt something after the attack. We felt changed. Can we keep that feeling? I believe we can, if we make a real effort, but I don't think it will be easy. What kept the unity and concern for others alive in World War II was the ongoing need for sacrifice. If little more is asked of us this time, we stand in danger of slipping back into our complacency.

It's not comfortable to say so, but I think important to remember: We kill too. Every society makes choices about when killing is justified. In World War II, virtually every country involved dropped bombs on cities, not to knock out strategic targets, but to destroy the cities themselves and the people in them. I'm not trying to judge whether any or all of those acts were necessary, but I hope that we would act with great care when we choose to take lives. I would pray, especially, right now, that our reaction to what we've experienced will be fair and just. That may be a more complicated decision than we realize, but if we believe in Christ, we will renounce war, only go into it when the cause is clear, and we will commit our deepest efforts to proclaiming peace.

There are so many questions. But we absolutely must ask them. The great danger to all of us is not that we will get weighed down by the difficult judgments, but much more, that we will never even ask the questions, that we'll merely let the world pull us along. I hope my books make for good entertainment, but I also hope they cause readers to think and pray. We need God's help in making such important choices, but he can't put the answers in our heart if we don't make room for them.

 

 

Click here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.


© 2001 Meridian Magazine.  All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

About the Author:

 

Born in 1943 in Ogden, Utah, Dean Hughes has published more than 80 books for children, young adults, and adults. He wrote several Mormon novels early in his career, including Hooper Haller, Jenny Haller, Cornbread and Prayer, Under the Same Stars, and As Wide as the River. More recently he has been working on the best-selling Children of the Promise series of historical novels about World War II, published by Deseret Book.

The holder of a B.A. degree from Weber State College and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Washington, Hughes was an associate professor of English at Central Missouri State from 1972 to 1980 and a part-time visiting professor at Brigham Young University from 1980 to 1982. He has also worked as a part-time editor and consultant, guest lecturer, and workshop leader at various writer's conferences. After 17 years of full-time writing, he recently returned to the classroom as a creative writing professor at BYU. He and his wife Kathleen have three children and three grandsons; he and his son Tom have co-authored three nonfiction books.

Related Article:
Irreantum Interview with Novelist Dean Hughes, author of Deseret Book's best-selling Children of the Promise series
What do you think?
Share your thoughts, comments, and impressions about this article.
Article Archive:

Voices Archive

Format for Print
Click Here