|
|
| Why
does a light bulb represent an idea? |
Here we see the somehow Jesus Christ
is "in all and through all things" and that he literally
is "the light of the sun." Moreover, we learn that when
a cartoonist draws a light bulb above someone's head to represent
them having a "bright" idea, that they were on the right
track. That is, we learn that the light which "enlighteneth
your eyes . . . is the same light that quickeneth your understandings."
If that means what it seems to be saying literally, then a little
light actually does turn on inside our minds when we see a new
truth. Note that the light discussed in this paper is not the
"Gift of the Holy Ghost," which is given to Christians
who make a formal priesthood covenant to follow Jesus Christ.
Rather, as explained in these scriptures, it is the light given
to all mankind as a guide, regardless of their religion (compare
John 1:9).
By stating it several times in these
few verses, the Lord emphasizes that this "light" is
in all things and fills all of space. It is omnipresent. It is
not a dead substance, but it allows the Creator be in touch with
all things by literally being "in and through" them.
He can truly know how we feel and what we think because his light
and life fills our entire being.
Then the final verse provides more
real meat for the physicist. We are told that this Light of Christ
is also "the law by which all things are governed."
What does that mean? Let us turn to what science has discovered
about the laws which govern all things, to see if these two perspectives
have anything in common.
The
Laws of Physics
|
|
| Sir
Isaac Newton |
Scientists have discovered many laws
of nature. They have learned some basic rules about how objects
appear to interact, how light appears to travel and interact with
other light and matter. They have studied gravity, magnetism and
electricity and have learned laws which govern each. Using this
knowledge, we can predict eclipses, build bridges, and put a man
on the moon.
But where did these laws come from?
We know how the laws work, but what do we know about why
they work? It has long been a tenet of science that it only deals
with finding laws that describe how things work so that we can
have a better world by applying them in inventions and technology.
Science has no way to discover the ultimate cause behind the laws.
It makes little difference to how your cell phone works to know
whether the governing laws were written by a Creator, or whether
they are self-existent truths. We mostly just want our high-tech
devices to work, and the low-tech varieties also.
Thus, science has been content to
adopt the equations that came from some scientist's mind as explaining
things. Sir Isaac Newton produced some of the best known laws
of all time, including his three laws of motion, and law of gravity.
Maxwell later wrote the equations of electricity and magnetism,
and Schroedinger wrote an equation for quantum wave mechanics.
It is rarely asked why these equations work, we are just glad
that someone discovered that they do indeed work.
When a scientist does ask "why"
an equation works, the only answer allowed in science is to explain
it with an even more fundamental law. For example, Johannes Kepler
produced three laws which describe the motion of planets around
the sun. He gave no reason why they should work, but only claimed
that they do. Then Sir Isaac Newton came up with his laws of motion
and gravity, and was able to derive all of Kepler's laws from
them. Thus, Newton's appear to be more fundamental, and Kepler's
are now an exercise for the student.
The Luminiferous Ether
Scientists discovered many laws about
how light travels and behaves. At first there was a big debate
about whether light was a particle (like a little bullet) that
could travel through a vacuum or a wave (like sound) that required
a medium (like air) for transport. Newton proposed that it was
a particle, because it didn't seem to go around corners like waves
do. But then a host of wave properties of light were discovered,
such as interference (when wave crests add), and diffraction (it
does indeed go around corners). When Maxwell showed that light
could be explained as an electromagnetic wave, that seemed to
end the debate once and for all. Light was a wave. The medium
through which light traveled was called the "luminiferous
ether" or simply "ether." There were some famous,
and now amusing, statements made at the end of the nineteenth
century that physics had answered all the hard questions, and
all that was left was to fill in some details.
Before continuing the science, let's
look at how nineteenth century science was interpreted by some
LDS scholars, who compared the light of Christ to the ether:
"The Spirit of God which emanates
from Deity may be likened to electricity, or the universal ether,
as explained in our manual, which fills the earth and the air,
and is everywhere present. It is the power of God, the influence
that he exerts throughout all his works by which he can effect
his purposes and execute his will, in consonance with the laws
of free agency which he has conferred upon man. By means of this
Spirit every man is enlightened, the wicked as well as the good,
the intelligent and the ignorant, the high and the low, each in
accordance with his capacity to receive the light." — Joseph
Fielding Smith[1]
". . . from the presence of
these Divine Beings proceeds an essence or substance (perhaps
like unto ether) variously called 'spirit,' 'light,' 'light of
truth,' 'light of Christ,' corresponding somewhat to what other
teachers regard as 'vital force' or 'energy' which permeates all
nature and constitutes the immanence of God in the universe; through
which the purposes of the Divine Intelligence are impressed upon
other minds and also upon matter, and hence the orderly creations
and their maintenance—the cosmos." — B. H. Roberts[2]
So at that time, it looked like "light"
as understood by science and religion had something in common.
Now let's get back to science, to see how it's story changed.
One of those minor details yet to be determined at the end of
the nineteenth century concerned just what was the precise speed
of the earth moving through the ether. After all, the earth is
believed to orbit the sun, the sun is moving relative to the nearby
stars, and then our whole galaxy is rotating, so the earth's "absolute
speed" must be fairly large. Then in 1887 the famous Michelson-Morley
experiment failed to measure any speed at all relative to the
ether.[3]
The young Albert Einstein took that
result and used it to rewrite much of physics. He proposed as
one of his two fundamental postulates that the speed of light
is constant, independent of the motion of either the emitter or
observer. He declared that no experiment could be done to detect
the motion through the ether because of that property of light.
Then the big switch came, so watch the magician's hands closely.
Because science only studies the observable, and because even
in theory no experiment could detect the ether, then as far as
science is concerned the ether does not exist. Poof, the ether
has vanished. The vocabulary was amended, and it is now said that
light travels through a vacuum.
Light was then shown to have bullet-like
properties, and Einstein received the Nobel Prize for explaining
the "photoelectric effect." For a while, light seemed
to behave both as a particle ("photon") and also as
a wave. Later it was shown that all particles, such as electrons,
also have wave-like properties. In the minds of most physicists,
the apparently wave-particle duality of light was resolved on
the side of the photon, with all of the wave properties being
explained by the amazing theory of quantum electrodynamics.[4]
The Zero-Point Energy
When scientists began probing the
atom, and the entire arena of the tiny, it was discovered that
things there just do not follow Newton's laws. There are many
good introductory books to this whole world of what became known
as "quantum mechanics." Let us just look at one aspect
of the entire domain.
When the equations which describe
quantum mechanics became known, there was a huge term in them
which annoyed scientists. It represented a background energy,
which is present in and through all things. It was so large as
to overpower everything else in the visible universe. Richard
Feynman, Nobel Laureate in physics, estimated that the energy
in one cubic meter of space is enough to boil all of the oceans
on earth.[5]
That is so huge that it was reasoned that it could never be detected
because it was omnipresent. As a comparison, we live at the bottom
of a deep sea of air, which pushes in on our bodies with tons
of force.[6]
Why are we not crushed by it? Because there is also an equally
enormous pressure in our bodies pushing back out, so the effects
cancel. When we measure the pressure in an automobile tire, we
are actually just measuring the difference in the pressure inside,
compared to what is outside. Now, we can live just fine ignoring
the background air pressure until we decide to fly to the moon,
where we would explode without a pressurized space suit. In a
similar fashion, scientists "renormalized" the equations
of quantum mechanics by subtracting out this energy, and then
usually ignored it.
There are now a minority of physicists
who believe that there may indeed be some observable effects of
this background energy. It is an energy inherit in space itself
and may even represent a huge untapped source of energy.[7]
Because it exists and keeps atoms moving even at the coldest possible
temperature of zero degrees, it has become dubbed the "zero-point
energy" or simply ZPE. There is an excellent introduction
to ZPE on the CalPhysics website.[8]
ZPE: the Basis of Physical Law?
|
|
| Can
ZPE explain Newton's Laws? |
Even as Newton's laws superseded
Kepler's as being more fundamental, there is a possibility that
ZPE will provide the basis of both Newtonian physics as well as
quantum physics. Let's look at an example of each, which has been
published in the most credible physics journals.
Much of Newtonian physics is based
on a property of matter called inertia, which is its mysterious
resistance to a change in motion. What is the source of inertia?
One recent paper proposes that it might be the resistance of objects
to motion through the ZPE, and actually derives Newton's equations
from ZPE considerations.[9]
If such a proposal holds up, then ZPE is not only observable,
but is has been observable all along as part of the motion of
all matter.
|
|
| What
keeps an atom from collapsing? |
In the realm of quantum mechanics,
what holds an atom up has been a mystery. For example, what keeps
the electron from falling onto the proton in a hydrogen atom?
If the electron is orbiting the proton, then it should radiate
energy and collapse. But it doesn't. This paradox was first explained
by postulating that there are certain rules it has to obey, and
that light can only radiate away at certain energies which correspond
to the electron jumping between "shells" in which the
electrons supposedly reside. But then quantum mechanics appeared
and proposed that the electrons were somehow just in probability
clouds around the nucleus, and that their state could not be known
with certainty. Now progress is being made to solve this enigma
by the proposal that it may be the ZPE that is constantly supplying
energy to the atom to support it.[10]
If so, then far from not being observable, the ZPE may actually
be what allows matter even to exist. That seems to match very
closely the Lord's description of the Light of Christ.
Many excellent papers proposing that
ZPE might explain a wide range of physical laws have been reprinted
on the internet from scientific journals.[11]
Time will tell how far-reaching the implications of ZPE really
are.
ZPE Experiments
|
|
| The
Casimir Force caused by ZPE |
There are only a handful of experiments
which apparently detect the ZPE directly. One is called the "Casimir
Force" which is a pressure between two plates of a highly
charged capacitor.[12]
There is a great picture and explanation of a possible tie to
the expansion of universe at antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020917.html.
There is a wonderful book out summarizing
a multitude of rigorously done scientific experiments that may
relate to the ZPE. It is entitled The Field written by
Lynne McTaggart.[13]
She is an investigative journalist who began to wonder if scientific
experiments are being done to explain miraculous healings. She
discovered an entire physics subculture investigating a wide variety
of phenomena, usually classed as "paranormal" or "psychic."
Why did I just switch from talking
about zero-point energy to recommend a book reporting the results
on psychic phenomena? It is because some physicists have realized
that very solid scientific studies are being done indicating a
high probability that such phenomena are real, and then they are
left to explain the processes at work. The real problem for the
physicist is that the experiments indicate that people can influence
each other at a distance, and can sometimes know what is happening
a great distances and even in the past and future. It is as if
all things are connected by some sort of web of knowledge that
transcends space and time. If events cause some sort of ripple
in the ZPE, perhaps they can leave some sort of track that can
be discerned.
|
|
| Hal
Puthoff has contributed
greatly to ZPE studies. |
"Non-local" events are
well known in quantum mechanics. Those are events where two entities
"know" something about each other much faster than a
light signal could be sent between them. These are the essence
of many psychic phenomena, and they might be explained by the
ZPE. Thus, such observations are not beyond science at all, but
rather are predicted by the best and most modern science that
we know.
With that, I must add that the book
is recommended only as documenting many excellent scientific experiments
which are being done. Not surprisingly, it suffers from a very
poor understanding of the spirit world. The author and most physicists
know nothing of the spirit world at all, or even the human spirit,
much less God, angels, demons, ghosts, etc. They have merely proposed
the first step, which is this great sea of zero-point energy.
Thus, the book tends to explain all psychic phenomena with the
ZPE, much as modern medicine now explains most disease as genetic,
after having believed most was viral, after having believed most
was bacterial. But if you can ignore the sweeping claims that
ZPE explains all, you may enjoy interpreting the results of the
experiments for yourself.
Following
the Light
It may be interesting that quantum
physics might be discovering what many of a wide variety of faiths
have believed for years, that there is a light within each of
us which has been given to all mankind to follow. What the experiments
show is that we can learn to discern this light to know about
and influence how others think, feel, and act; to know something
about the past and future, and to know about things in remote
places. But we should not be surprised that someone tuned to this
light could know such things. Have we not been promised that very
thing?
And if your eye be single to my
glory, your whole bodies shall be filled with light, and there
shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with
light comprehendeth all things. — D&C 88:67
Is that promise literally true? And
could it apply to this life, or only to the resurrection?
The Lord gave the parable of the
Wheat and the Tares, about letting the righteous and the wicked
grow mature together until the end of the world (Mat. 13:24-30,
D&C 86). At that time, the wheat (the righteous) will be gathered
and the tares (weeds which resemble wheat, the wicked) will be
burned. How will this be accomplished? Could it be that the whole
idea of the righteous being spiritually mature means that they
will have learned to follow the light within which will lead them
to safety? Could it be that those who do not follow the Light
of Christ, which is given to everyone ever born on this earth,
are those who will perish? It has been prophesied that:
The time will come when no man
nor woman will be able to endure on borrowed light. Each will
have to be guided by the light within himself. If you do not have
it, how can you stand? — Heber C. Kimball [14]
If we follow the light and hearken
to the voice of the Spirit, we will be led back to God (D&C
84:47). We can also be led to make many more right decisions and
to be much more aware of others and how best to serve their needs.
We can become powerful spiritual beings as children of our Heavenly
Father. We can become aware of danger, and know how to protect
our families.
Deadly Distractions
There may be a lesson we can learn
from the animals about following the inner light. If animals are
so good at going by their feelings, and sensing danger, then how
is it they get killed and eaten by their enemies? Tom Brown, the
Tracker, a trained naturalist, has made a lifetime study of watching
animals in the wild. He once said[15]
that he has observed three reasons that animals let their guard
down, lose their focus on their inner guidance, and pay the ultimate
price for one heedless moment. The first is to satisfy their own
physical needs, usually hunger. Often they are focused on their
own dinner, as just as they pounce on their prey, their own enemy
devours them both. The second is mating desires. While one animal
is focused on impressing a potential mate, he ignores warning
signals and is killed. And the third reason animals die needlessly
is materialism, usually manifest as territorialism. When attacked
by a larger predator, instead of fleeing they choose to stay and
guard their home or territory. They not only lose their territory,
but also their lives. Are they so different from us? Can we learn
a lesson from them?
Conclusion
Science is currently examining some
frontiers which were previously taboo. Some serious investigations
of the zero-point energy predicted by quantum mechanics are being
conducted, along with experiments in the psychic realm. ZPE is
not only closely tied to light, but to the very structure of all
matter. This sea of light might also be shown to be the basis
of many long-known physical laws. A detailed comparison of its
properties to those of the Light of Christ suggests that the two
are either closely related or are one and the same. In any case,
it is clear both from experiment and scripture that we would all
do well to follow the light within.
Notes
- Joseph Fielding Smith, Improvement
Era, Vol. 12, p. 389, March, 1909, quoted by himself in
Gospel Doctrine, p. 61.
- B.
H. Roberts, Comprehensive History of the Church, Vol.
2, Ch. 63, pp. 399-400.
- See "The Michelson-Morley
Experiment" in the Wikipedia at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment
- Feynmann, Richard, QED: The
Strange Theory of Light and Matter (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 1985) is a wonder introduction for the layman.
- A.C. Clark, "When Will the
Real Space Age Begin?" Ad Astra, May/June 1996:
13-15.
- At sea level the air pressure
is about 15 lbs/in2. A person with a surface area
of 2000 in2 feels a total inward force of 15 x 2000
= 30,000 lbs or 15 tons.
- Several people have claimed to
have built "free energy devices." Moray B. King has
noticed that the diverse inventions all have a few important
points in common, which suggest they might cohere the zero-point
energy by abruptly pulsing a glow plasma. See his Tapping
the Zero-Point Energy (Provo, Utah: Paraclete, 1989) and
Quest for Zero-Point Energy (Kempton, Ill.: Adventures
Unlimited Press, 2001). One of the best known and attested such
machines was that of T. Henry Moray, which is the subject of
King's most recent book, The Energy Machine of T. Henry Moray
(Kempton, Ill.: Adventures Unlimited Press, 2005). Unfortunately,
the commercialization of these machines has been suppressed
in every case, and many of the inventors have died in unfortunate
"accidents." The prospect for being allowed to use
such free energy may be much brighter in the millennium (Rev.
22:5?).
- CalPhysics Institute, "Zero
Point Energy and Zero Point Field," online at www.calphysics.org/zpe.html.
There are also links to many primary scientific articles.
- B. Haisch, A. Rueda & H.E.
Puthoff, "Inertia as a Zero-Point-Field Lorentz Force,"
Physical Review A, 49, No. 2 (1994): 678-694, on internet
at www.calphysics.org/articles/PRA94.pdf.
- H. Puthoff, "Ground State
of Hydrogen as a Zero-point-fluctuation-determined State,"
Physical Review D; 35 (1987): 3266-70, on internet at
www.calphysics.org/articles/puthoff_Hyd87.pdf.
- See www.calphysics.org/sci_articles.html.
- See "Casimir Effect"
in the Wikipedia at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect.
- Lynne McTaggart, The Field:
The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe (London:
Harper Collins, 2002).
- From an address given by LDS Apostle
Heber C. Kimball in 1867, a year before his death. Quoted in
LDS General Conference by his son J. Golden Kimball, from a
copy in his possession (Conference Report, April 1906).
It was also quoted as something to prepare for by Elder Harold
B. Lee in General Conference (Conference Report, October
1965, p. 128).
- From notes taken by the author
at Tom Brown's Basic Survival class in California, Aug. 13,
1997.