Click here to find out more
 


Click Here to Shop  -- Meridian Marketplace

LDSGetaway.com
LDSPro.com




Kates Camisoles Spring Sale






Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.
Meridian Magazine : : Home

Does an Equity Indexed Annuity Make Sense for You?
By Brad Halverson

Sometimes the stock market is just downright lousy. Wouldn’t you love to be invested in the stock market when it is setting new highs and then disappear before it falls apart for months or sometimes years at a time? What if you could magically re-emerge once a new bull market ensues — achieving the juxtaposing investing goals of growth and stability?

Some people believe they have found that perfect investment.

Not long ago, a friend was telling me about a new guaranteed S&P 500 stock fund in her 401k. The substance of our conversation went as follows:

“Interesting, I have never heard about a guaranteed stock fund. Where did you hear about that?” I asked.

“My brother-in-law is a broker,” she declared. “He put us in this stock fund that goes up with the market and protects us from losing anything when the market goes down. He said these are really hot because you can’t lose in the stock market. Over the last five years people are getting something like 8% every year.”

“Wow! How much does it cost?” I wondered.

“He didn’t charge us. It was his wedding gift to us!” she added happily.   

Suspicious, I peppered her with questions.  Do you know how it works? How much do you pay every year? Who is actually guaranteeing the money? What about taxes? Why is this “investment” in your 401k?

As my list of questions expanded, her responses contracted. She knew very little how her hard earned retirement was invested. As it turns out, my 30-year-old friend had placed her money into a rather complex savings vehicle — an annuity. Even more, this one had a fancy title — an Equity Indexed Annuity (EIA). I began to wonder if my friend, who is rather ordinary in her understanding of savings and investment choices, was involved in an EIA, how many other people really know what they are getting into?

Annuities Basics

Before we tackle the complexity of an EIA, you should understand an annuity is a contract sold by an insurance company. In exchange for your lump sum “investment,” the company agrees to pay you income for a certain length of time or for your life. These contracts generally carry fixed or variable terms and feature a tax-deferred component; meaning you can wait to pay Uncle Sam on the income you receive.

Annuities offer the assurance of a regular stream of income, tax deferred status and the protection against losing principal with a poor investment choice. This “guarantee” is important, particularly to retirees who naturally choose low risk approaches to preserving their retirement. The fear of losing everything is a valid concern for many people and a real factor when entering into investment decisions.

While annuities have a place for certain people, they carry certain observable drawbacks. The advertised tax-deferred growth is taxed at ordinary income rates (for most people this is higher than capital gains rates). Further, annuities are complex and often restrict investment choices, lack liquidity, and offer mediocre insurance coverage. Finally, it is no secret that annuities are big moneymakers for brokers. No one is against advisers making a living, but the high costs call into question the efficiency of the savings. Remember, everyone in the sales chain has to make some money in order to offer it to you.

Equity Index Annuity Basics

The equity indexed annuity is a glorified fixed annuity. Like a certificate of deposit (CD), a fixed annuity offers a modest return. The difference with the EIA is in how it credits interest to your account. Rather than paying the rate dictated by the contract, the EIA pays a return using a complicated formula based on a stock market index, like the S&P 500 Index. Investors gain as the market index goes up, but are protected when the market swoons by a minimum guarantee, usually 2% to 3% as stated in the contract. How is this possible? Insurance companies use a variety of sophisticated investments, including combining stock options and bonds to deliver on their promise, lock in profits and protect themselves from risk.

Looking Under the Hood of the Vehicle

Upside with no downside — sounds pretty good, right? Here is the main concern: When adding the costs of deploying these sophisticated investment techniques and the costs of paying the sales force, the potential returns you can make are substantially reduced. To better understand this problem; let’s take a closer look at the way these are sold to individuals, the fees, terms and complexity of the product.

Marketing

When you get asked something like, “How would like you to make stock market returns without the risk?” you know someone is selling an EIA. With 7% to 15% commissions going to brokers, it is no wonder EIAs have become a multi-billion dollar business in the past few years. Consequently, the suitability of an EIA for many investors is largely ignored. 

Guaranteed stock funds do not exist. Let’s call a spade a spade. This is not a mutual fund or even a regulated investment (like stocks, bonds or mutual funds); it is a savings vehicle designed to give a better return than CDs and money markets.

No matter who tries to sell you an EIA, read the contract or get someone to help you. The insurance company will follow the agreement regardless of what a broker makes you believe it says.

Terms

So what’s in the contract? If you have the patience to read it (most people don’t) you will find the following:

  • participation rates (what portion of the upside you really get)
  • interest rate caps (maximum upside you can get)
  • surrender charges (ouch — what you pay for pulling out early)
  • withdrawal rates (how much you can pull out each year without penalty)
  • guaranteed minimums (promised minimum return)
  • indexing method (annual resets, point to point, or high water mark)
  • interest calculation (annual averaging or compounding)

No two EIAs are alike, so the terms and conditions are too numerous to explore here. With mind-numbing detail in each contract, it is a big question mark whether salespeople peddling these things really know how they work.

If your eyes haven’t glazed over by now, let’s pause to distill these terms into salient points with a simplified example. Let’s say you lock $10,000 away in a 10-year EIA, with a participation rate of 70%, interest rate cap of 12%, guaranteed minimum of 3% on 90% of principal and see what happens in three scenarios.

Scenario A:   S&P 500 up 20%. You earn $1,200 (limited by interest cap) compared to $2,000 earned in an S&P 500 index fund.
Scenario B:     S&P 500 up 10%. You earn $700 (constrained by 70% participation rate) versus index of $1,000.
Scenario C:    S&P 500 down 10%. You earn $170 (90% of principal earns 3%, or $270; 10% not protected tags you for $100) compared to losing $1,000 in the market.

Clearly, Scenario C is the saving grace. But look closely, only 90% of your money is protected — not exactly a “can’t lose” investment. Some may argue the loss is minimal and you bear no market risk while still getting the upside of the market. Sure, but don’t forget that in no scenario do you get all of the upside of the market.

Oh, by the way, while the EIA return is tied to the S&P 500, this does not include dividends. Historically, the S&P has returned just over 10% annually, with about 4% coming from dividends.

If your investment goals change, the surrender charge for cashing out before 10 years will cost you dearly in the early years, including a hit of 5% to 15% and immediate taxation at ordinary income tax rates on interest earned — although many EIA contracts allow penalty-free 10% annual withdrawals. Some advisers argue that long surrender charges are a blessing in order to prevent you from missing out on the long-term performance of the stock market. Seems like an expensive way to maintain an investment discipline.

Investment Objectives and Risks

It is clear that investors in EIAs are trying to achieve two investment objectives — preservation of capital and growth of their money. This may be one of the keys to EIA popularity. What people have done, however, is confuse objectives with risks. Understanding the risk and potential rewards of both preservation of capital and growth of capital would lead a reasonable investor to allocate a portion of funds for each objective, with lower cost and more flexibility.

For the stable portion of your money, an allocation of CDs, U.S. Treasury Inflation Indexed Securities (TIPS), government and corporate bonds or REITs are better alternatives. Rates of returns on these investments exceed the 3% of EIAs, while allowing you more flexibility. Plus, as interest rates rise, these alternatives are increasingly attractive.

For growth, an allocation of low cost stock index funds (large, small, international) can help you fully participate in market upside. In fact, a 60% allocation of 10-year government bonds and 40% allocation of an S&P index fund both held for 10 years, in each rolling 10-year period since 1950, would have returned no less than 3% per year! Even more, almost half the time you would have earned in excess of 10% per year. These are solid returns while retaining full access to your money and avoiding high surrender penalties.

You Can Do Better Than an EIA

My friend is no different from the average retiree or investor. She hears about the stock market upside with no downside. Artfully, the EIA seems like a no-brainer investment. What is actually happening, however, is a wealth transfer of premiums paid by unsophisticated investors to insurance companies and their sales forces.

EIAs are designed to exceed the fixed income returns of CDs and money markets by 1 or 2%. This is not a stock market investment, but instead a savings alternative. While ruling out an EIA in every case would be unwise, the glaring costs, limits on upside market returns, onerous penalties and extreme complexity add up to an expensive way to investment peace of mind.  Unless you are inclined to pay, or a family member gives you an EIA with no fees, other investment options make sense for most people.

 

About the Author:

Bradley P. Halverson, CFA, CPA, is an Equity Securities Analyst at NorthPointe Capital in Troy, MI. He received his B.S. and M.S. in accounting from Brigham Young University and his MBA from the University of Michigan. Prior to working as a buyside analyst, Brad has held various positions in investment banking and public accounting. He resides in Michigan with his wife, Anne-Marie, and their four children.

What do you think?
Related Articles:

Money Wise Article Archive

Format for Print
Click here

 

Share the article on this page with a friend.
Click here.