
By
Kevin Broderick, M.S., LMFT
In
an era of shifting values and activists’ agendas, it can
be an unpopular proposition to espouse true doctrine.
Living and proclaiming such values in a “politically correct”
world is often viewed as judgmental, intolerant, and insensitive.
Despite the threat of being viewed as such, I will document
six points of true doctrine that, if understood and followed,
would heal the pains and misfortunes of millions of children.
(1) The Law of Chastity
In
the mid 1960’s, seven percent of all births in the United
States occurred out of wedlock. By the year 1999, the
number of out of wedlock births rose to thirty three percent
— or 1.30 million (National Vital Statistics Reports,
2000). Further, researches have documented that nearly
one half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended
(Henshaw, 1998).
In
The Family: A Proclamation to the World (1995),
we are reminded that, “The sacred powers of procreation
are to be employed only between man and woman, lawfully
wedded as husband and wife.”
If
this one doctrine were understood and followed, how many
unwed pregnancies would occur? What would that mean for
children?
(2) Sanctity of Life
In
the United States, about one half of all unintended pregnancies
are terminated by abortion (Henshaw, 1998). In the year
2000, 1.31 million abortions took place (Jones, et al.,
2002).
Our
modern day prophet, Gordon B. Hinckley (1998), has directly
addressed this issue;
How
wonderful a thing is a child! How beautiful is a newborn
babe. There is no greater miracle than the creation of
human life. Abortion is an ugly thing, a debasing thing,
a thing which inevitably brings remorse and sorrow and
regret. While we denounce it, we make allowance in such
circumstances as when pregnancy is the result of incest
or rape, when the life or health of the mother is judged
by competent medical authority to be in serious jeopardy,
or when the fetus is known by competent medical authority
to have serious defects that will not allow the baby to
survive beyond birth. But such instances are rare, and
there is only a negligible probability of their occurring…
There is a far better way. If there is no prospect of
marriage to the man involved, leaving the mother alone,
there remains the very welcome option of placing the child
for adoption by parents who will love it and care for
it. There are many such couples in good homes who long
for a child and cannot have one
(p. 70).
Likewise,
in The Family: A Proclamation to the World (1995),
we read, “We affirm the sanctity of life and of its importance
in God’s eternal plan.” If we all understood and genuinely
valued the sanctity of life, how many abortions would
there be?
(3) Child Entitlement
Nearly
20 million children in the United States live in single-parent
homes (National Fatherhood Initiative). Children of single
parents:
- Are more likely to divorce
- Are more likely to become
unwed parents themselves
- Are more likely to experience
poverty
- Are more likely to experience
physical and mental health challenges
- Are more likely to abuse
drugs
- Are more likely to commit
suicide or engage in criminal behavior
- Tend to have lower grades
and are less likely to attend college
- Experience higher rates
of unemployment than children who live with married
parents (Ensign, 2005).
- More than 70 percent of
juveniles in state reform institutions are from fatherless
homes (National Council for Adoption).
Some
24 million children (34 percent) live absent their biological
father (National Fatherhood Initiative). Researchers
have concluded that father hunger is the primary cause
of the declining well-being of children in our society
and is associated with social problems such as teenage
pregnancy, child abuse, and domestic violence against
women (Blackenhorn, 1995; Herzog, 2001)
The
First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles solemnly
proclaim that, “Children are entitled to birth within
the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and
a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.”
(The Family: A Proclamation to the World, 1995).
In
addition, the First Presidency boldly wrote that unwed
parents,
…who do not marry should not be counseled to keep the infant
as a condition of repentance or out of a sense of obligation
to care for one’s own. Unwed parents are not able to provide
the blessings of the sealing covenant. Further, they
are generally unable to provide a stable, nurturing environment
which is so essential for the baby’s well-being (First
Presidency Letter, 2002).
If
we truly understood the principle of child entitlement,
how many children would struggle in single parent homes?
How many “fatherless” children would there be?
(4) Blessings of the Covenant
What are the blessings that children receive who are sealed
to a mother and a father? The First Presidency (2002)
wrote, “Children sealed to parents have claim upon the
blessings of the gospel beyond what others are entitled
to receive.”
Joseph Fielding Smith (1955) taught that children sealed to
parents:
…may receive a greater guidance, a
greater protection, a greater inspiration from the Spirit
of the Lord; and then there is no power that can take
them away from their parents…if the children do not sin
as John says, “unto death,” the parents may still feel
after them and eventually bring them back near to them
again (p. 90).
Brigham Young (1977) noted, that children who are sealed,
“are legal heirs to the kingdom and to all its blessings
and promises, and they are the only ones that are on this
earth” (p. 202).
How would society and the welfare of children be different
if there were more infants sealed to temple worthy parents?
(5) Sacred Duties
In
2001, welfare authorities substantiated 903,000 cases
of child abuse and neglect (Child trends Data Bank, 2003).
These are situations that were actually reported to proper
authorities, investigated, and authenticated. In 2002,
approximately 1,400 children died due to abuse or neglect
(National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information,
2004).
In
2003, 800,000 children were placed in foster care homes
in the United States. By the end of that year, 523,000
children were still in foster care. Rates of Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder among adults who were formerly in foster
care were twice as high as U.S. war veterans. The majority
of adults faced major challenges in the areas of mental
health, education, and employment; one third had no health
insurance and lived at or below poverty; one fourth experienced
homelessness after foster care. Each year 20,000 young
people between the ages of 18 and 21 must leave the foster
care system and are left without any support, family connections,
or the skills they need to succeed in life (Casey Family
Programs, 2005).
In
1999, there were more than 127,000 distressed children
waiting for an adoptive home. Of those children, 46,000
were actually adopted (U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 2001).
Through
the gospel we are taught that, “Parents have a sacred
duty to rear their children in love and righteousness,
to provide for their physical and spiritual needs, to
teach them to love and serve one another, to observe the
commandments of God and to be law-abiding citizens wherever
they live. Husbands and wives — mothers and fathers —
will be held accountable before God for the discharge
of these obligations.” (The Family: A Proclamation to
the World, 1995).
If
all parents truly understood their sacred duties, how
many abused and neglected children would there be? How
many children would need foster care? How many needy
children would be waiting for an adoptive home?
(6)
Divine Parental Responsibilities
Trends
towards devaluing the significance of both mothers and
fathers in a child’s life are growing. This is evident
in the media, public education, political agendas and
professional research. Author and researcher, A. Dean
Byrd (2004) wrote, “Attempts have been made in professional
literature to blur the lines between genders, and to claim
that neither mothers nor fathers are necessary for positive
child outcomes. Such research has become more and more
bold with their activist agendas” (p. 215).
In
The Family: A Proclamation to the World (1995),
we learn,
By divine design, fathers are to preside over their families
in love and righteousness and are responsible to provide
the necessities of life and protection for their families.
Mothers are primarily responsible for the nurture of their
children. In these sacred responsibilities, fathers and
mothers are obligated to help one another as equal partners.
Each
parental role is essential for the well-being of children.
If we all fully understood the true nature of Divine parental
responsibilities, how would the lives of parents be improved?
How would the lives of children be improved?
Counsel
to Unwed Parents
Congruent
with the doctrinal principles noted above, the First Presidency
(2002) offers the following counsel to Church leaders,
When a man and woman conceive a child out of wedlock,
every effort should be made to encourage them to marry.
When the probability of a successful marriage is unlikely
due to age or other circumstances, unwed parents should
be counseled to place the child for adoption through LDS
Family Services to ensure that the baby will be sealed
to temple-worthy parents. Adoption is an unselfish, loving
decision that blesses both the birth parents and the child
in this life and in eternity.
Unmarried parents should give prayerful consideration
to the best interests of the child and the blessings that
can come to an infant who is sealed to a mother and father.
Related guidance can also be found on page seven of
the new book published by the Church, True to the Faith.
Birth
parents who choose adoption;
- Are more likely to complete high
school and go on to higher education
- Are more likely to be employed
and less likely to live in poverty or receive public
assistance
- Are less likely to repeat out-of-wedlock
pregnancy
(Ensign, 2002)
According
to research compiled by the National Council for Adoption,
adolescents, who were adopted as infants, demonstrate
noteworthy signs of well being in areas such as:
- School performance
- Friendships
- Volunteerism
- Optimism
- Self-esteem
- Social competency
- Feelings of support from
others
- Low levels of anxiety
Adopted
adolescents scored low on indicators of high risk behaviors
such as:
- Use of alcohol
- Depression
- Vandalism
- Group fighting
- Theft
- Weapon use
(National Council For Adoption, Adoption Awareness, 2005)
LDS Family Services has hundreds of sealed and temple worthy couples hoping
to adopt an infant child. You can see their pictures
and read about them at www.itsaboutlove.org. The agency
ensures that children placed for adoption are sealed to
temple worthy parents.
Despite
the Counsel of the First Presidency and the noted positive
factors for birth parents and adopted children, only 1.9
percent of infants born out of wedlock are placed for
adoption (National Council for Adoption, 1999, p. 41).
Forty years ago, marriage and adoption were the two most
popular alternatives that benefited children of unwed
parents. Today, abortion or single parenting is their
principal fate.
When
a child is born to unwed parents, how could adoption benefit
the birth parents? How would adoptive parents benefit?
Most importantly, how can adoption benefit the life of
a child?
Conclusion
Elder
Boyd K. Packer (2004) taught, “True doctrine, understood,
changes attitudes and behavior. The Study of the doctrines
of the gospel will improve behavior quicker than a study
of behavior will improve behavior.” Though it may not
be “politically correct” to espouse such doctrines and
values, the temporal and eternal welfare of God’s children
is at stake. May we better understand and live true doctrine
in our lives for children truly are “an heritage of the
Lord” (Psalms 127:3).
References
Blankenhorn,
D. (1995). Fatherless America: Confronting our most
urgent social problem. New York: Basic.
Byrd,
A. Dean. (2004). Gender Complementarity and Child-rearing:
Where Tradition and Science Agree. Journal of Law
and Family Studies, Volume, 6, Number 2, pp. 213-235.
Casey
Family Programs (2005). www.casey.org/Resources/Publications.
Child
Trends Data Bank (2003). Cross Currents, http://childtrendsdatabank.org.
Ensign
(2002). Adoption and the Unwed Mother, February,
p. 63.
Ensign
(2005). Strengthening the Family: Within the Bonds of Matrimony, August, p. 16.
First
Presidency Letter (2002). Adoption and Unwed Parents,
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. June.
Henshaw,
SK (1998). Unintended pregnancies in the United States,
Family Planning Perspectives, 30(1): 24-29 &
46.
Herzog,
J.M. (2001). Father hunger. Hillsdale, New Jersey:
The analytic Press.
Hinckley,
Gordon B. (1998). What Are People Asking about Us? Ensign,
November.
Jones,
RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK (2002). Patterns in the
socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions
in 2000-2001, Perspectives on Sexual Reproductive Health,
34(5):226-235).
National
Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information (2004).
Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities:
Statistics and Interventions http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov
.
National
Council For Adoption (2005). Adoption Awareness: Consider
the possibilities, Adoption Liaison Workbook.
National
Council for Adoption (1999). National Adoption Data,
Adoption Factbook III. Park Press Quality Printing,
Inc..
National
Council for Adoption. Unmarried parents today: Effects
of single parenting on children, Washington, D.C..
National
Fatherhood Initiative. Father facts: top 10 father
facts, www.fatherhood.org/fatherfacts_t10.asp.
National
Vital Statistics Reports (2000). Nonmarital Childbearing
in the United States, 1940-1999, Vol. 28(16) October
18.
Packer,
Boyd K. (2004). Do Not Fear, Ensign, May, 77.
Popenoe,
D. (1996). Life without father. New York: Mark
Kessler Books, The Free Press.
Smith,
Joseph Fielding (1955). Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 2. Bookcraft.
The
Family: A Proclamation to the World.
www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,161-1-11-1,00.html
U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (2001), Children's
Bureau, AFCARS REPORT 6, at 1. June.
Young,
Brigham (1977). Discourses of Brigham Young. Deseret
Book.