Religious
Left Strategizes on
Homosexual "Marriage"
Here
is how those who oppose the Federal Marriage Amendment will state
their case.
At a June 18 meeting of homosexual rights activist, opponents
of the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) revealed a strategy of
utilizing liberal clergy to argue that the proposed amendment
would limit the free exercise of religion. At the meeting, clergy
from "progressive" Protestant denominations, along with
one Reformed Jewish Rabbi claimed the proposed FMA might be used
to ban them from performing ceremonies that bless same-sex unions.
Speakers at the meeting, sponsored by the left-leaning pressure
group People for the American Way, made it clear that they intend to halt religious conservatives
from co-opting the marriage issue. Rabbi Michael Namath even echoed
some language used by traditional Christians when he referred
to the family as the "fundamental institution of the society."
Namath then turned such reasoning on its head by arguing that homosexual marriage could produce "families of loving gay and lesbian couples . . .capable of creating a nurturing environment for children." One minister of the Disciples of Christ said his denomination's opposition to the marriage amendment was based in part on their belief that it favors one religion over another. He also echoed a commonly heard theme saying that the definition of marriage should be determined by individual churches and local civil authorities and not the federal government. None of the participants acknowledged the growing possibility that the Federal Courts may eventually impose such unions on the entire nation.
The
Federal Marriage Amendment, sponsored by Colorado Republican Sen.
Wayne Allard, is set for a vote during the week of July 12 and
consists of two sentences. "Marriage in the
Namath
said the language is open to interpretation and poses a "serious
threat to the free exercise of religion. . . . some warn that
if the FMA is adopted, performing a religious wedding ceremony
for same-sex couples might be unconstitutional and illegal."
He did not explain why clergy who currently perform same-sex "marriages"
that are not recognized by civil law would suddenly be prohibited
from continuing to perform such ceremonies by the FMA.
Meeting organizers also did their best to draw parallels between
the civil rights movement of the 1960s and the drive to legalize
same sex marriage. They distributed literature from several African-American,
Hispanic and other civil rights organizations who oppose the marriage
amendment. But several Congressional aides have said that the
African-American population largely opposes gay marriage and many
bitterly resent the civil rights analogy. Kenneth Samuel, a black
preacher from Atlanta who spoke at the meeting, opposes the FMA
but admitted that the marriage amendment is popular within the
African-American community.
Congressional aides also believe the issue of same-sex marriage represents one of the first real "cross over" issues for Republicans seeking black support which has largely gone to the Democrats over the past half century.
Copyright---2004 Culture of Life Foundation.