|
Share the article on
this page with a friend.
Click
here.
|
|
| 
Waging
War and Meeting a Prince of Peace
Chapter 6, part 2 of
The Blessings of Abraham: Becoming a Zion
People
By E. Douglas Clark
Unfortunately,
as Winston Churchill observed, “The story of the human race is
war.” [1] It was the story also of Abraham’s day, one of the
most warlike generations ever,
[2]
echoing Enoch’s time (see Moses 7:16) and foreshadowing
the latter-days (see D&C 45:66–71).
If the
Abraham story mentions war rarely, it is only because the Lord
led him out of harm’s way and preserved him in relatively peaceful
venues. But the time did come when the ravages of war touched
even the great Abraham.
Just miles
from where he resided in Hebron came the combined military forces of a coalition
of kings “ravaging and laying waste.”
[3]
They killed many and took some captives, among them
Lot and his family.
As recounted
in the Genesis Apocryphon, one of Lot’s shepherds who had escaped
“came to Abram ... and told him that Lot
... and all his flocks had been captured, but that he was not
dead, and that the kings had taken the road of the Great Valley
towards their territory, taking prisoners, ravaging, smiting,
killing and proceeding as far as the city of Damascus.
Abram
wept for Lot.”
[4]
Josephus adds that Abraham “was moved” also “with compassion
for his friends and neighbors, the Sodomites,” [5]
many of whom had likewise been taken captive. Abraham’s
compassion for these people is a remarkable commentary on his
character: he did not shun the wicked but befriended them in the
hope of helping them.
Only such
compassion could move Abraham to now take up arms. Like his descendant
Captain Moroni, Abraham was a man of “perfect understanding” who
“did not delight in bloodshed” but “did joy in the liberty and
the freedom of his country, and his brethren from bondage and
slavery” (Alma 48:11).
Indeed, Abraham’s ardent desire from the beginning was to become
“a prince of peace” (Abraham 1:2). But now, as related in the
Genesis Apocryphon, “Abram braced himself, stood up and chose
from among his servants those fit for war: three hundred and eighteen,” [6]
men from his Zion
community. As a modern writer comments, “A man of peace, the battle
was not of his seeking.” [7]
And yet
“he did not trust in these, for they were but a small fraction
of the kings’ forces, but in God, the champion and defender of
the just.” [8]
They were going in the strength of the Lord, and he
urged no one to come who was fearful
[9]
or had committed any trespass against God. [10] “If your hearts are turned toward Heaven,” he declared,
“you will go forth and the Almighty will make your enemies like
herbage.” [11]
The speech
was similar to what ancient Israel’s
high priest would later make to soldiers before going to war.
[12]
It was the same faith that Abraham’s Nephite descendants
would manifest when they trusted that if they kept God’s commandments,
he would prosper and protect them (Alma
48:14).
Abraham
actually hoped to accomplish the rescue mission without the shedding
of blood, taking gold and silver to ransom the captives, [13]
but he was prepared to engage in battle if need be.
With these few hundred men, and joined by a few faithful friends,
Abraham hurriedly set out northward “in pursuit.” [14]
What the
sources do not state, but what latter-day revelation makes clear,
is that God had actually commanded Abraham to undertake this expedition.
“This is the law I gave unto ... Abraham, and all mine ancient
prophets and apostles ... that they should not go out unto battle
against any nation, kindred, tongue, or people, save I, the Lord,
commanded them ... And I the Lord, would fight their battles”
(D&C 98:32–33, 38).
When Abraham
arrived, he discovered what he had already suspected, that he
was vastly outnumbered and would not be able to ransom the captives
with money. And although he knew that the Almighty was with him,
he immediately began to deploy his limited resources in the most
strategic manner possible. Using the cover of night to conceal
the smallness of his forces, [15]
he divided up his men and fanned out in preparation
for a sudden surprise attack
[16]
from all four sides. [17]
But ancient
sources also tell of miraculous happenings that evening. Not only
was Abraham’s way illuminated by planetary light, [18]
but as he began the battle, he became aware of divine
assistance extended to him in a miraculous way: “he saw the Shechinah,
attended by celestial hosts, lighting up his path,” [19]
so that, despite outward appearances, he understood
that they who were with them were more than those against them. [20]
What must
have seemed by objective standards an absurd attack soon proved
to be a miraculous rout as, according to the Genesis Apocryphon,
Abraham’s vastly outnumbered army courageously gave battle to
the kings’ soldiers, killing some and chasing the others until
“all [were] fleeing before him ... He retrieved from them all
that they had captured, all that they had looted and all their
own goods. He also saved Lot ... and all his flocks and brought back all the captives.” [21]
He led them back home, and also, says the Zohar, back
to repentance.
[22]
It was
truly the sword of the Lord and of Abraham, [23]
for the Holy One fought with him and slew his enemies. [24] The royal armies that Abraham opposed would surely
have had their chariots, judging from other battles around the
same time and place of which we have record.“ But Abraham’s strength that night came
from him who had once told Abraham, “I cause the wind and the
fire to be my chariot” — even the invincible Lord of creation
(Abr. 2:7). Abraham’s armed might availed him only because God
helped him.
Conversely,
God helped him in battle only after he had mustered his armed
men and prepared himself militarily. God helps those who take
all measures necessary to help themselves”
[26]
as seen in the life of Abraham’s righteous descendant
Mormon, a man of God who took up the sword to defend his people,
qualifying for the Lord’s deliverance by first making use of the
means the Lord had provided. [27]
Abraham’s
victory was miraculous also for the fact that he lost not a single
one of his men,
[28] not unlike the later miraculous preservation of
his two thousand young Lamanite descendants serving under Helaman
(see Alma 57:25). And
Abraham’s victory was actually won before the clash of swords
began, for, according to a midrash, his victory came not by strength
of “weapons and armor but rather with prayer and supplication.”
[29]
For which he gratefully knelt again and gave thanks
to the Almighty:
Sovereign
of all the worlds! Not by the power of my hand, nor by the power
of my right hand have I done all these things, but by the power
of Thy right hand with which Thou dost shield me in this world
and in the world to come. [30]
Had
Your glory not fought alongside me and aided me, how could one
man have prevailed against such an overwhelming force. They fell
into my hands only because You helped me.
[31]
Thus it
was that Abraham, contrary to human nature, “became more humble,
not more proud, in victory.”
[32]
Abraham’s
miraculous victory echoed that of his forefather Enoch, whom the
Lord had strengthened with miraculous power as Enoch led the people
of Zion to defend themselves
in battle (Moses 7:13–17). According to Jewish tradition, Abraham’s
victory also foreshadowed the future, even the redemption of his
descendants in Egypt
on Passover night, as well as the still-future redemption of Israel: “At the End of Days, the Messiah will
deal just such a stunning, total defeat to his adversaries.”
[33]
Christians
recognize the Messiah as Jesus Christ, seed of Abraham, whose
final victory, according to early Christian tradition in England,
began on the cross and was foreshadowed by Abraham’s remarkable
victory against the kings of the earth. “Of all men living,” says
the Saxon Genesis concerning Abraham, “never did anyone conduct
with a small troop against so great a force a more worthy warfare”
— which thing was a type, insists the Venerable Bede, of the ultimate
Victory that would rescue us all:
Therefore
well did Abram conquer his enemies ... and set his brother free,
since he prefigured the one to be born from his own seed, who
through suffering on the cross summoned the world from death.
[34]
Such prefiguring
of Jesus was only possible because, as told by the early church
fathers, “Jesus was ... the strength of Abraham in this encounter.” [35]
As Abraham
journeyed home with the ransomed captives and their property,
according to ancient Jewish tradition, relieved and grateful peoples
and their kings came to hail the conquering hero and express their
gratitude and allegiance. They made a cedar throne for Abraham,
bowing to him as their king and even their god.
[36] Suddenly, here was an unexpected opportunity laid
at Abraham’s feet to extend his influence over the land that God
had already given him and to create political alliances and a
dominion that could possibly continue to grow into a scope commensurate
with his mandate to bless all nations.
Even from
a purely defensive posture, the opportunity seemed uncannily timely,
for according to a number of ancient sources, the coalition’s
original intent had been first to take Lot and then Abraham, whose success in his missionary efforts had been
extensive in turning many from their idolatry.
[37]
The success may have been significant enough to threaten
the very order of things, including tribute based on the economy
of idolatry.
Accordingly,
for Abraham to now accept this offer of kingship would put him
in a position to counter any further attack by the coalition,
thereby securing the land that God had given him.
And wasn’t
Abraham already the planet’s rightful monarch, holding the same
royal patriarchal authority over all the human race as held earlier
by Adam and Noah in their “patriarchal reigns” (Abr. 1:26)? Might
this unusual offer even be God’s vindication of that right, allowing
Abraham the opportunity to seize what was rightfully his and secure
the land God had given him by accepting political power? It was
the kind of rare opportunity that ambitious souls throughout history
have craved, as seen in the careers of conquerors like Alexander
and Napoleon and Genghis Khan.
Commenting
on the opportunity presented to Abraham, a modern rabbi has observed
that “grateful nations often seek to confer kingship and even
deification upon victorious military leaders. It takes great strength
of character for a military leader to spurn the power and the
adulation that is his for the taking.” [38] Only rarely does history produce such strength,
with the greatest example being the first — Abraham.
Responding
to the cheering crowds, he simply “warded them off, and said,
‘The universe has its King, and it has its God!’ He declined all
honors,” [39] urging that “if I am pleasing to you and you desire
to deal kindly with me, then love one another and deal peacefully
together. Open the doors of your houses to the poor, the stranger
and the wayfarer, and believe in the Lord God, the Creator of
heaven and earth, and serve him with all your heart.”
[40]
Abraham’s
royal patriarchal authority and its exercise was governed solely
upon the priesthood principles of righteousness and humility,
not upon the accolades of men. Indeed, it was precisely because
Abraham did not set his heart upon the things of this world, nor
aspire to the honors of men, that he had such power in the priesthood
(see D&C 121:34–36) as he presided over Zion.
And the
door to that Zion could not be opened by heaping praise on Abraham,
but only by obeying the eternal gospel that he taught concerning
faith in Christ, repentance of sins, baptism, and the Holy Ghost.
It was yet another occasion to bring men to Christ. Abraham’s
goal was not to change the map but hearts, and he would conquer
not by the sword but only by love.
But the
king of Sodom had unfinished business. He came forward and asked for the return
of his subjects that Abraham had rescued, while recognizing Abraham’s
right to the war booty. “Give me the people,” said the king, “you
take the property.”
[41]
In fact, by rights of war, Abraham now owned not only
the goods but also the people, and he could have kept them as
slaves, sold them, or demanded a ransom from the king of Sodom.
[42]
“He might have done so,” notes one writer. “Many would
have done so.”
[43]
But Abraham
had made a prior covenant with the Lord not to enrich himself
in the enterprise. “The king of Sodom knew nothing of Abraham’s covenant with the
Lord,” observed President Kimball. “Abraham could have made himself
rich by receiving of the king’s [offer]. But he had made an oath
which he would not violate. Oh, that all of God’s children could
be so true!”
[44]
Abraham
returned both the people and the goods, renouncing his right to
everything. He “would have nothing to do with an offer of reward
from the king of Sodom
... Abraham’s reward would come not from the kings of this world
but from Yahweh [Jehovah], ‘the LORD, the Creator of heaven and
earth.’” [45]
Indeed, “Abraham’s motives had been pure from the very
beginning” of the enterprise,
[46]
and he was not about to compromise his principles now.
“Here is a pattern to copy.”
[47]
Another
monarch stepping forth to greet Abraham was Melchizedek, who,
according to Genesis, brought forth bread and wine and blessed
Abraham, and he in turn paid tithes to Melchizedek.
[48]
Genesis gives no hint as to who this mysterious Melchizedek
was, who appears suddenly and then will not be mentioned again.
Some of
the mystery is removed by other sources, which tell that the reason
his genealogy isn’t given in Genesis is because he was not one
of the patriarchs. [49] But it is latter-day scripture as restored through
Joseph Smith that gives us the most information about the remarkable
Melchizedek, who was “a man of faith, who wrought righteousness;
and when a child he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions,
and quenched the violence of fire,” and qualified for and received
his ordination to the Holy Priesthood after the Order of the Son
of God (JST Gen. 14:26).
Later,
as told in the Brass Plates, Melchizedek ruled as a king over
the land of Salem.
And his
people had waxed strong in iniquity and abominations; yea, they
had all gone astray; they were full of all manner of wickedness;
but Melchizedek, having exercised mighty faith, ... did preach
repentance unto his people. And behold, they did repent; and Melchizedek
did establish peace in the land in his days; therefore he was
called the prince of peace, for he was the king of Salem
[literally “peace” in Hebrew]; and he did reign under his father.
Now there were many before him, and also there were many afterwards,
but none were greater (Alma
13:17–19).
Faith,
righteousness, miracles, preaching repentance, establishing peace
— such were Abraham’s accomplishments also. If, as the proverb
goes, it takes a prophet to understand a prophet, then Abraham
and Melchizedek had found in each other a truly resonant soul.
It was one of the most important meetings in history, a summit
of two spiritual giants establishing the order of the Kingdom
of God.
2.Jubilees 11:2–5, in VanderKam, Book of Jubilees,
64–65, quoted above in chapter 1, and see accompanying discussion.
3.1QapGen 21.28, in Martinez
and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition,
1:47.
4.1QapGen 22.1–5, in Martinez
and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition,
1:47.
5.Josephus, Jewish Antiquities 1.10.1, in Josephus
4, 87.
6.1QapGen 22.5–6, in Martinez
and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition,
1:47.
7.Noble, Great Men of God, 60.
8.On Abraham 40, in Philo VI, 115.
9.“He thinned their numbers by reading the section
of the heralds, as you read, What man is there that is fearful
. . . or faint-hearted . . . (Deut. xx, 8)?” Genesis Rabbah
43:2, in Freedman, Midrash Rabbah, Genesis, 1:353.
10.Ginzberg, Legends of the Jews,
1:231.
11.Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical
Interpretation, 2:158, quoting Yelamdenu.
12.As pointed out in Klinghoffer,
Discovery of God, 91, citing Tanchuma, Lech L’chah 13.
13.Zohar, Vayera 112b, in Sperling
and Simon, Zohar, 1:355.
14.1QapGen 22.7, in Martinez and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls
Study Edition, 1:47.
15.According to the medieval Italian
rabbi Sforno, in Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical Interpretation,
2:159.
16.See Kasher, Encyclopedia of
Biblical Interpretation, 2:159, note e to commentary
on verse 15.
17.1QapGen 22.8, in Martinez and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls
Study Edition, 1:47
18.Genesis Rabbah 43:3, in Freedman,
Midrash Rabbah, Genesis, 1:354.
19.Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical
Interpretation, 2:160, quoting Zohar; and see Zohar, Vayera
112b, in Sperling and Simon, Zohar, 1:355.
20.As would happen later with Abraham’s
descendant Elisha. See 2 Kings 6:16.
21.1QapGen 22.9–12, in Martinez and Tigchelaar, Dead Sea Scrolls
Study Edition, 1:47.
22.Kasher, Encyclopedia of Biblical
Interpretation, 2:161, quoting Zohar 1, 80b.
23.As it would be with Abraham’s
descendant Gideon. See Judges 7:20.
24.See Zohar, Vayera 112b, in Sperling
and Simon, Zohar, 1:355.
25.
Cotterell, Chariot, 7–21.
28.On Abraham 40, in Philo VI,
115.
29.
Leviticus Rabbah 28, translation
in Miller, Abraham Friend of God, 37.
30.Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer 27, in
Friedlander, Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, 196.
31.
Miller, Abraham Friend of God,
37–38, quoting Tanchuma.
32.Oden, Ancient Christian Commentary,
2:27
33.Klinghoffer, Discovery of God,
93.
34.
Andy Orchard, “Conspicuous Heroism: Abraham,
Prudentius, and the Old English Verse Genesis,” in Carruthers,
Heroes and Heroines, 52–53.
35.Bowker, Targums and Rabbinic
Literature, 195. These are Bowker’s words summarizing and
paraphrasing passages from Barnabas and Clement.
36. See Levner, Legends of Israel,
64–65; Ginzberg, Legends of the Jews, 1:232; and Baring-Gould,
Legends of the Patriarchs, 168–69.
37. See Kasher, Encyclopedia of
Biblical Interpretation, 2:155, quoting several sources, including
Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, Genesis Rabbah, Midrash Hagadol, and Zohar.
38. Miller, Abraham Friend of God,
40.
39. Ginzberg, Legends of the Jews,
1:232.
40. Levner, Legends of Israel,
65
41. Genesis 14:21, in Westermann, Genesis
12–36, 186
42, Hertz, Pentateuch and Haftorahs, 53.
43. Noble, Great Men of God, 61.
44.Spencer W. Kimball, “The Example
of Abraham,” Ensign, June 1975, 6.
45. John H. Sailhamer, in Gaebelein,
Expositor’s Bible Commentary, 2:123.
46. Miller, Abraham Friend of God,
43.
47. Noble, Great Men of God,
61.
48. In Genesis the wording is ambiguous
as to whether Abraham gave or received the tithe. That Abraham
paid the tithe is attested not only in the Joseph Smith Translation
(JST, Gen. 14:37–39) and the Book of Mormon (Alma 13:15), but also in Josephus, the Genesis
Apocryphon, and some rabbinic texts. See Feldman, Josephus,
68–69 n. 573.
49. Bowker, Targums and Rabbinic
Literature, 197 n. e (quoting Kitab alMajal). See also
The Book of the Bee XXI, in Budge, Book of the Bee, 33–34;
Budge, Cave of Treasures,
152–53; Combat of Adam and Eve with Satan 3.16, in Malan,
Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan, 164.
© 2007 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved
|
|
About
the Author: |
E. Douglas Clark is an attorney and the author of the article on “Abraham’
in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism, and of a recent book
titled The Blessings of Abraham: Becoming a Zion People.
|
| Related
Resources |
| |
| What
do you think? |
| |
Format
for Print
Click Here |
|
Share the article on this page
with a friend.
Click
here.
|
|
|