| 
The
Allegory of the Olive Tree
Excerpts from Step by Step Through the Book of Mormon by Alan
C. Miner (Unpublished)
The Ancient America
Foundation (AAF) is pleased to present AAF Notes: a series of research
articles by scholars of Book of Mormon culture and history and reviewed
by AAF editors. Visit our website (http://www.ancientamerica.org).
House of Israel Likened to a Tame Olive Tree
According to Monte Nyman, the prophet
Zenos tells a story in Jacob 5, in which he likens the House of
Israel to a tame Olive Tree that was planted, grew mature, and started
to decay. The Master of the Vineyard (Jesus Christ) and his servants
(the prophets) saw it, pruned it, and nourished it. Some natural
branches were cast off and wild ones grafted in.
When that didn't work, the Master left
the location of the tame Olive Tree roots (the blood of Israel among
the Gentiles) and took some tender young natural branches to the
nethermost part of the vineyard and grafted them in to wild olive
trees (the Gentiles). This story goes on to span the history of
the House of Israel until the end of the earth. The illustration
below outlines the ideas discussed in the book. [Monte S. Nyman,
An Ensign to All People, pp. 35, 36]
The Seven Time Periods of the Allegory [Reference
Verses in Jacob 5]
| |
1. Jacob - Prophets (1800
B.C. - 400 B.C.) [vv. 3-14] |
| |
2. Prophets
- Christ (400 B.C. - A.D. 30) [v. 15] |
| |
3. Jesus Christ
(A.D. 30 - A.D. 34) [vv. 16-28] |
| |
4. Apostasy
- Restoration (? - A.D. 1820) [v. 29] |
| |
5. Restoration
(A.D. 1820 - Millennium) [vv. 30-75] |
| |
6. Millennium
(1000 yrs) [v. 76] |
|
Botanical Aspects of Olive
Culture Relevant to The Allegory of the Olive Tree, [Wilford M.
Hess, Daniel J. Fairbanks, John W. Welch, and Jonathan K. Driggs
F.A.R.M.S., pp. 552-554]
At the conclusion of a lengthy article
by Wilford Hess, Daniel Fairbanks, John Welch, and Jonathan Driggs,
covering in detail the various horticulture practices described
in Jacob 5 related to the cultivation of the olive tree, the following
is said:
Based on the botanical and horticultural information present in
the archaeological and historical record, and reflected in Jacob
5, we can conclude that the ancients were superb horticulturists
and had a profound understanding of vital biological and plant
cultural principles. Most of the botanical and horticultural principles
in Jacob 5 are sound and are very important for olive culture.
In addition, the one or two points,
according to our interpretation, that represent unusual or anomalous
circumstances are necessary enhancements to the message of the
allegory.
In this single chapter of the Book of Mormon there are many detailed
horticultural practices and procedures that were not likely known
by an untrained person, and may not have been fully appreciated
by professional botanists or horticulturalists at the time the
Book of Mormon was translated.
Even today, outside of olive-growing
areas, professional horticulturalists may not fully appreciate
some of the unique aspects of olive culture. Given the extensive
detail about olive culture present in Jacob 5, we must give Zenos
much credit for a high degree of horticultural knowledge, which
many take for granted.
Examples of what the ancients and Zenos evidently knew were how
to prune, dig about, dung, and nourish; how to graft tame to wild
and wild to tame, and how to graft tame back into tame; how to
balance tops and roots by pruning, and the reasons for doing this;
how to save the roots of trees whose branches had decayed, and
how to transplant branches to preserve the desired traits of good
plants; how to preserve and store fruit and how to distinguish
between good and bad fruit; how well plants grow on good and bad
soil; how to care for trees to cause young and tender branches
to shoot forth; that they could graft wild to tame to rejuvenate
tame; that specific cultivars produced well in certain areas;
how to remove the bitter glucosides from the fruit; that they
could burn an orchard to reestablish a new one; that plants grown
from seeds would not have desirable characteristics; the importance
of elimination of old wood and debris by burning, and how to deal
with pests and pathogens; how to prevent heavy bearing one year
and no bearing the next by proper pruning; the necessity to plant
more than one cultivar for pollination; and how to propagate scions
with the desirable genetic material.
Interestingly, much of this sophisticated technology was probably
lost in the Nephite civilization, for the olive is not mentioned
again in the Book of Mormon after Jacob 5, an indication that
the lands of the Book of Mormon may not have been suitable for
growing olives ... The only regions on the American continents
with Mediterranean climates where olive culture is economically
feasible are the regions of California, Chile, and Argentina.
Joseph Smith probably knew how to prune, dig about, dung, and
nourish local fruit trees; he probably knew a little about grafting,
and he may have been familiar with some other horticultural principles,
but not likely those peculiarly related to olive culture.
The Olive Tree as a Symbol
for the House of Israel [Book of Mormon Student Manual Religion
121 and 122, pp. 47-48]
The use of the olive tree as a symbol
for the house of Israel is an excellent example of how God uses
symbolism to teach his children gospel laws and principles. For
centuries the olive tree has been associated with peace. War and
its grim attendants of destruction — rape of the land, siege,
and death — were hardly conducive to the cultivation of olive
orchards, that require many years of careful husbandry to bring
into full production.
When the dove returned to the ark,
it carried an olive leaf in its beak, as though to symbolize that
God was again at peace with the earth (see Genesis 8:11) ... There
is further symbolic significance in the cultivation of an olive
tree. If the green slip of an olive tree is merely planted and allowed
to grow, it develops into the wild olive, a bush that grows without
control into a tangle of limbs and branches producing only a small,
worthless fruit (see Harold N. and Alma L. Moldenke, Plants of the
Bible, p. 159).
To become the productive "tame"
olive tree, the main stem of the wild tree must be cut back completely
and a branch from a tame olive tree grafted into the stem of the
wild one. With careful pruning and cultivating the tree will begin
to produce its first fruit in about seven years, but it will not
become fully productive for nearly fifteen years.
In other words, the olive tree cannot
become productive by itself; it requires grafting by the husbandman
to bring it into production.
Throughout its history Israel has demonstrated
the remarkable aptness characterized by the symbol of the olive
tree. When they gave themselves to their God for pruning and grafting
the Israelites prospered and bore much fruit, but when they turned
from Christ, the Master of the vineyard, and sought to become their
own source of life and sustenance they became wild and unfruitful.
Two other characteristics of the olive
tree further illustrate how it is an appropriate symbol for Israel.
First, though requiring nearly fifteen years to come into full production,
an olive tree may produce fruit for centuries. Some trees now growing
in the Holy Land have been producing fruit abundantly for at least
four hundred years.
The second amazing quality of the tree
is that as it finally grows old and begins to die, the roots send
up a number of new green shoots that, if grafted and pruned, will
mature into full-grown olive trees. The root of the tree will also
send up shoots after the tree is cut down. Thus, while the tree
itself may produce fruit for centuries, the root of the tree may
go on producing fruit and new trees for millennia.
It is believed that some of the ancient
olive trees located in Israel today have come from trees that were
ancient during Christ's mortal ministry. How can Israel be compared
to an olive tree, which time and again seems to have been cut down,
and destroyed, yet, each time a new tree springs forth from the
roots?
Zenos was not the only prophet to use the olive tree as a symbol
for the chosen people of God. Jeremiah, foreseeing the coming destruction
of the Jews by Babylonia, compared the covenant people to a green
olive tree consumed by fire (see Jeremiah 11:16). The apostle Paul
used a brief allegory almost identical to that of Zenos's to warn
the Roman Christians against pride as they compared their favored
position to that of the Jews (see Romans 11:16-24). In modern revelation,
the Lord uses the parable of a vineyard and olive trees to show
his will concerning the redemption of Zion (see D&C 101:43-58).
How Greek Philosophy Corrupted the Christian Concept of
God, [Richard R. Hopkins,pp. 34-36, 79, 84-85]
Richard Hopkins notes that according
to the prophecies in the Old Testament (e.g., Isaiah 11:10), New
Testament (e.g., Romans 11:25), and the Book of Mormon (e.g., Jacob
5:7-17), the Gentiles (Hellens) were to be drawn to Christ following
His mortal ministry, when Israel would reject Him (Isaiah 53). In
the Allegory of Zenos, after the natural branches of the olive-tree
fail to produce good fruit, we find that the Lord of the vineyard
instructs his servant to "take thou the branches of the wild
olive-tree and graft them in, in the stead thereof" (Jacob
5:9).
Thus, according to Hopkins, the Gentiles
[or branches of the wild olive-tree] were expected to take from
the Jews [or the branches of the natural olive-tree] the mantle
of the Gospel and be grafted into the tree [Christianity] until
the last days when ... the "times of the Gentiles" would
be "fulfilled" (D&C 45:25).
At the time Isaiah announced this prediction [or at the time Zenos
pronounced his allegory] reasonable men could have seen it as ludicrous.
How could a pagan, polytheistic society of depraved idolaters be
brought to a point where they would even be interested in the Gospel,
let alone supplant the House of Israel as its chief proponent? What
could possibly have predisposed the Gentiles to accept Christ in
such numbers that Christianity would become the dominant religious
system of the Gentile world in less than three hundred years after
Christ's death?
The answers to these questions are
essential to an understanding of what happened to the early Church
as it made the transition from Jewish exclusivity to Gentile dominance.
The foundation for the change started very shortly after the first
prophecy of its occurrence was given ... That was when a major shift
in Gentile worship began through the medium of the classical Greek
philosophers ... Although there are not enough resemblances between
Greek theology and Judaism to conclude that the philosophers derived
very many of their ideas from the Old Testament, there are several
similarities. These similarities ultimately caused the Gentiles
to be both attracted to the full truth and the Gospel and confused
by the erroneous elements that remained in Hellenism …
Hellenism, the philosophy and religion of the Greeks at the time
of Christ, was founded primarily on the ideas of six Greek thinkers:
Phythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus, Anaxagoras, Plato, and Aristotle,
who were active from around 550 B.C. to about 350 B.C. It should
be remembered that the ideas of these Greek philosophers were truly
revolutionary. They contradicted the prevailing views of the pagan
system, and the men who advanced them waged the same battle for
religious liberty fought by reformers in every age.
The movement even had its own martyrs,
Heraclitus and Socrates being among the most noted. Over the centuries
that followed, the distinctive ideas of these men grew into various
schools of thought. The beliefs of those schools were gradually
syncretized in the minds of the Greek public so that by the time
of Christ, they were viewed by most of the Gentile world as a single
monotheistic system of beliefs distinct from the polytheism and
pantheism of the older, though still popular, pagan religions …
Through its pervasive education system, Hellenism invaded Christianity
with the same force Christianity invaded Hellenism. The result was
a subtle transformation in the ideas of the Church. Among Bible
scholars, prophesies of an apostasy from the teachings of Christ
are well known. The issue for them is not whether it would occur,
but when.
Until recently, it would have been
unnecessary to prove to Protestant theologians that prophesies of
a great apostasy were fulfilled during the Dark Ages, when the Church
was under Roman rule. Today, however, many Evangelical Christian
scholars deny that any such apostasy occurred. Mormonism teaches
that it has already occurred.
It is Richard Hopkins' contention that
the apostasy in regard to the central points of biblical theology
was complete by the end of the second century A.D. He documents
in a very detailed and organized manner how the Gentiles corrupted
the Christian concept of God. However, what amazes him most is not
that the apostasy occurred, but that it did not result in an even
greater departure from the truth. Thus, we find in Jacob 5:15-17:
And it came to pass that a long
time passed away, and the Lord of the vineyard said unto this
servant: come, let us go down into the vineyard, that we may labor
in the vineyard ... And it came to pass that the servant said
unto his master: Behold, look here; behold the tree. And it came
to pass that the Lord of the vineyard looked and beheld the tree
in the which the wild olive branches had been grafted; and it
had sprung forth and begun to bear fruit. And he beheld that it
was good; and the fruit thereof was like unto the natural fruit.
Copyright © 1999-2002 Ancient
America Foundation. This message may be forwarded with identifying
information. For more information or to subscribe or unsubscribe
to AAF Notes or utilize the AAF order form, visit http://www.ancientamerica.org
and click “Contact us.” Refer, by email, comments or
questions to aaf@ancientamerica.org
Return
to Top of Article
Click
here to sign up for Meridian's FREE email updates.
© 2008 Meridian
Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|