Wednesday, October 22 2014


menuClick Here
Marvin Payne
Thursday, February 13 2014

Backstage Graffiti: Animals Backstage

By Marvin Payne Notify me when this author publishesComment on Article
Email Author
Author Archive
Send To a Friend
Print Article Bookmark and Share

I’m in rehearsals for a production of Pride and Prejudice “down to the BY,” as my wife’s grandfather would have said. (Occasionally I’ve wondered why folks don’t call that university “The ‘B.’” It’s probably because of the “Y” on the mountain. “Why just a ‘Y’?” you ask, in unison and, because of the supra-global sweep of Meridian’s readership, in various colorful dialects.

Well, the story is that when somebody had the idea of emblazoning “BYU” on the mountainside, they prudently started with the Y, so the whole thing would be centered. But the Y was so hard to make that they abandoned the founder’s first initial ((“B”)) and the letter that might have let the public in on what all that stone and whitewash stands for ((a “U”)). This story may not be true, but it has the authentic aura that surrounds folk tales—thank goodness, because folk tales are, in most ways that really matter, more true than actual history. Certainly more worthy of believing in.)

I’m Mr Bennet (the British don’t punctuate “Mr”). I’m one of three grown-ups in the cast, the other two being Mrs Bennet (the British don’t punctuate “Mrs”) and the Lady Catherine de Bourgh (nobody would dare punctuate Lady Catherine de Bourgh). Typically the only two other grown-ups in the room are the director, Barta Heiner, and one of the two dramaturgs, Anne Flinders. (The playwright, Melissa Leilani Larson, may be considered by some to be just over the line into grown-upness. ((You must remember that all these designations are being assigned by a guy who considers Barack Obama too young to hold a driver’s license.)) ) For rehearsals involving only the Bennet family, I’ve typically been the only guy in the room—totally female family, female director, female production staff, and two female dramaturgs. As will be the audience, too, except for those few guys who are savvy enough to know that accompanying their dates to any Jane Austen show will score major, major points.

(A word about dramaturgs: Good luck defining what the heck one is, besides brainy and nice and one of them has a dog that acts ((in this very show!)). I think the definition of “dramaturg” is something you feel rather than try to articulate. And it takes a certain kind of person to feel it—Bill Gates, for example, will not even admit that “dramaturg” is a word.)

On the subject of dogs that act: I never learned to act. I mean, like in a classroom or from a teacher. Everybody else in this show did. Some still are, technically, being students and all, but mostly everybody has already learned. They’re terrific. Even the two grown-ups who aren’t me. Laura Wardle, who is Mrs Bennet, was the only woman in memory (her memory) who ever received a Master’s degree in Acting from BYU. Lady Catherine de Bourgh is in real life Hilary Straga, who’s a casting director for LDS Church films. It’s delightful to be considered on a sort of equal footing with Ms (the British don’t punctuate “Ms”) Straga in this project, because out in church filmland all our encounters are between the powerful Keeper of the Keys and the hungry actor. But she has always brought tremendous grace to being so powerful, and some of my best acting has been for just her, even when I didn’t get the part I was after.

(Anecdote that I may have shared before: For the big Joseph Smith movie, they were looking to cast the guards at Richmond Jail, whom the prophet called “Fiends Of The Infernal Pit.” When I was called in to audition I found deeps of evil in me that I brought to the surface with a fury that visibly frightened Hilary, and would have frightened even the intrepid Catherine de Bourgh. I was excited when I learned that I’d been cast as a fiend OTIP, and looked forward to a useful stretch as an actor, sort of like I got once upon a time being Sweeney Todd. But when I showed up, they yanked me out of the awful card-playing squad that bragged and blasphemed at the cell door and put me inside with the brethren, silently checking their chains and trying not to disturb them too much. Then when the prophet stood to rebuke The Fiends, the camera pushed in for a close-up on me actually being spiritually affected by his words. They made me “The Sympathetic Fiend”! My audition was wasted! Oh well, I got to tote a truly wicked rifle.)

Dogs that can act. Last Thursday evening, our director gave us an assignment: Carefully research and choose an animal that your character might be if your character were an animal. Don’t tell anybody what it is, but come early on Saturday morning prepared for an “acting exercise.” Everybody else probably had a pretty good idea of what to expect. Not me.

Here’s how it went down. We all lay on tumbling mats on the floor with the lights dimmed. The company, who seemed to know innately exactly what to do, had arrayed big black blocks of varying proportions in almost random patterns, some forming little walls, some tunnels, some leaning on others in diagonal ways. In the silence, with our eyes closed, we followed Barta’s instructions to breathe in energy and breathe out tension. We were allowed to endow these gasses with colors, if we thought it might help. This was not general, lung-centric breathing, but was dispensed to every part of our persons from toenails to the hair follicles upon our heads, where, on me at least, the gasses, both incoming and outgoing, got lost.

Once we had reached a meditative state that would have made the Beatles jealous, we were invited to contemplate our chosen animals. On the day before, I wasn’t able to think of as many as five animals to choose from, let alone an animal who embodied the essential characteristics of an English country gentleman living in a high estrogen zone. So I asked Mr Google “What kind of animal would my character be?” Instantly I had at my fingertips a few dozen quizzes I could take that would determine the answer scientifically, unanimously, incontrovertibly. So I just started answering the questions the way I knew Mr Bennet would. The first quiz concluded that Mr Bennet was a wolf. I took another. It affirmed that Mr Bennet was an unspecified bird. The third quiz made him a dolphin, the fourth a bear, and the fifth quiz (the first one wherein the questions were composed with conventional grammar) identified Bennet as a mole.

Actually, mole attracted me, because the site said that both Bob Dylan and John Lennon were moles. But I wasn’t confident I could pull it off, so I took a sixth quiz. It said “Cat” and something inside me went “ping” in an affirmative manner. Cats are something this actor can take or leave, but here are the parallels: Bennet is mostly about emotional hiding out. See the cat when something chaotic is happening, tiptoeing off to somewhere the heck else.

1 Comment

  1. Okay, I can relate to this, being of British stock and not accentuating the Mr, Mrs, Ms, & Lady! I can also accept, without even a quibble, that an upstanding dog may wind up looking like an orangutang for a brief time. Hasn't anyone ever heard of shape-shifters in this day and age? What I cannot understand is how come those who were doing the selections couldn't see the potential of this obviously talented wannabe thespian. Commiserations and best of luck for next time around.

Add Comment